![]() |
status privacy about contact |
|
Welcome to Orcmid's Lair, the playground for family connections, pastimes, and scholarly vocation -- the collected professional and recreational work of Dennis E. Hamilton
Archives
![]() Atom Feed Recent Items ![]() Associated Blogs nfoCentrale Associated Sites |
2005-04-23Neighborhood Cats
![]() ![]() Labels: cats, neighborhood and Seattle Comments: The content of your blog is exactly what I needed, I like your blog, I sincerely hope that your blog a rapid increase in traffic density, which help promote your blog and we hope that your blog is being updated and placed can always be richer and more colorful. I think I saw Shmoo cat, as I call her, on a missing poster at the vet yesterday. I hope it is not her. 2005-04-21The Unreliability of Election Systems is Not TechnologicalACM News Service: Carter-Baker Commission Weighs U.S. Voting Changes. It is interesting to learn of these seemingly high-minded approaches for adding trustworthiness to the election process, living in a state where the 2004 gubernatorial election remains in dispute and is slowly wending its way through the courts. What's clear here in King County, Washington, where we have optical mark-sense ballots, is that the logistics, human processes, and failures to preserve auditability put the benefits of a paper-record optical ballot as in doubt as any other choice. It is also a problem in that, at least during recounts, election workers will "enhance" ballots that are marked too faintly and sometimes too ambiguously so they will pass in the scanner. The handling of absentee and provisional ballots failed badly, to the point that one begins to wonder how going to an all-mail ballot system will work at all. A critical aspect of the situation here is that all of the fact finding and research work, with persistent and determined use of FOI requests, has been conducted by citizens in response to the election office's lame observation that they are not responsible to assure the integrity of voting, the citizens must do that (e.g., challenge the eligibility of voters, find the ballots cast for the still-registered deceased, etc.). And we are in an era where citizens can do just that. Those who don't like the prospective outcome denigrate the partisan zealotry that accompanies this effort, forgetting that in our system it is difficult for an uninjured party to claim attention of the courts, let alone have any self-interest in so doing. So it has to be adversarial. I think the triumph here is another for citizen activism and the redistribution of authority that weblogs are providing, especially when it takes the kind of determination and painstaking research that print journalists are not prepared to invest, for whatever reason. I also think that resolution of this particular election is going to provide the kind of serious case study that will be used as the basis for serious reform elsewhere. It could also inspire measures to make this kind of failure more difficult to recognize and counter-act. Let's keep watching. Laurence Arnold's 2005-04-18 (updated) Bloomberg article reports on a number of national-election recommendations that would certainly be valuable here. What's missing, based on our experience in Washington State, is an appreciation for the corruptibility of the processes that occur away from the polling place. A wider system-level perspective seems important in these debates, which tend to fall into the solution space without identifying the overall problem space and what it takes to ensure the integrity of election systems all the way through reliable determination of a verifiable outcome. [updated 2005-04-21T19:09Z because even I could not stand some of the fractured prose here [;<)] Comments: Post a Comment Teens on Privacy, Blogging, and First Amendment Rights - And Adult ConfusionACM News Service: Next Gen Weighs a 'Secure' Future. Kim Zetter's 2005-04-18 Wired News article gives new meaning to sophistication. The edited transcription provides a sense of the delight that these young people brought to the session. The kids' view of RFID tagging of students and of school-imposed filtering and blocking are worth digesting. It took no thought at all for the kids to figure out how to game the system. They also point out that the filters don't work, not only because it is possible for kids to work around them, but because they also filter valuable, relevant material. The suppression of blog access and IM access in schools was also discussed more in the session. In the audience, I heard repeated observations that these were not your ordinary teen-agers. I think we should look at this a little differently. Suppose these are ordinary teen-agers; if we don't see this quality in those around us, maybe it's about the quality of our relationship and not about our ordinary teens. I think Dana Boyd had a lot to do with having the kids be at ease and open. I was taken by the respectful way she interacted with them. I had the sense that she worked with them enough to know what to ask before they paraded to the podium. I didn't know about this event until Danah blogged about coming to Seattle to lead the panel. That was enough to discover that Bruce Schneier was the luncheon speaker that day and I could register for the one day. It was a day playing hookey from my dissertation project, and I needed it [;<). Comments: Post a Comment |
![]() |
You are navigating Orcmid's Lair. |
template
created 2002-10-28-07:25 -0800 (pst)
by orcmid |